0 thoughts on “154 Portrait after multiplemichael”

  1. This work really surprised me. The first thing I thought was that the eyes were off center. Then I looked at the original and, either the original is at an angle or his eyes are off center. Anyway, you got the eyes perfectly, even the bag under the left eye.

    I do have some difficulty with the beard. In the original, the beard is more coarse and somewhat scraggly, where you have the beard rather smooth, as if it would be soft to the touch. Overall, you did captures all the details of his face. it is a good work. There I go, being a critic..

    Reply
    • Thanks for your comment!
      Yeah the beard is not all there.. I’d like to try and draw a beard this way later on. I like this kind of stylization. It looks like the insides of a figg! I Tried doing the individual hairs like little sausages, but they did perhaps turn out too small and regular. It would seems that there’s a lot of work in the original.

      Reply
  2. ————–FIRST, THANK YOU !!!!
    STRANGLINGLY RECOGNIZABLE
    THE FBI CAN’T TURN THE MACHINES OFF
    are they recording the scrounging, hustling, loafing ?
    collecting deciduous hairs ?
    YOU ARE ON EVERY “WATCH” LIST IMAGINABLE
    THEY KNOW IF YOU ARE RELATED TO ALDOUS HUXLEY
    NO FUMBLINGS ARE SAFE
    PROTECT YOUR ESSENTIAL FIRE
    ALWAYS DO MORE ART !!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to multiplemichael Cancel reply